• About Me
  • ADX-Files
  • Blog
  • Creative Writing Exercises
  • Doctor Who
    • Books
    • Classic Who
      • Lost Episodes Found?
      • Was Doctor Who Rubbish in the 1980s?
    • Clips and Teasers
    • Doctor Who News
    • Matt and David
    • Official Webpage
    • Previews
      • The Name of The Doctor
    • The Doctors
      • Peter Capaldi
    • Theories!
      • Who is Hurt’s Who?
  • Dracula
    • Actors
    • Literature
      • Anno Dracula Series
      • Dracula by Bram Stoker
      • Dracula Rekindled
    • Movies
    • New Series
  • EDX-Files
  • Extracts
    • Bacchae: The Pie-Eyed Piper
    • Finding Delphi
    • God Almighty, Aphrodite!
    • Petronius’ Satyricon
    • Queens of Alba
    • Sisterhood of the Wolf
    • Sleepless
    • War Beyond Reguntor: Prologue
  • Guest Appearances
  • Hex Files
  • Jack the Ripper
  • Links
    • Dickson Telfer
    • Donald Robertson
    • IAFA
    • Radio of Horror
    • Sherlock Cares
    • SupernaturalUFO.com
    • Terry Pratchett
    • Ultimate Fantasy Books
  • Meditations
    • View From Above
  • Poetry
    • Limpet
    • The Tommyknocker Knicker Nicker
  • Political
    • I Voted For Scotland
    • On the Eve of the Scottish Independence Referendum
    • Real-Life Horror of Scotland’s Poverty in 2014
  • Published
    • Bacchae: The Pie-Eyed Piper
    • Erotic Magic of the Ancients
    • Nods to the Old Gods: The Pagan and Magical References of the Scottish Romantics
    • Petronius’ Satyricon
  • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
      • Killing a Spider
      • The Philosophy of CBT: Stoic Philosophy as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy
    • Movie Reviews
      • Contact
  • Sherlock
    • Sherlock Cares
    • Virtuoso
  • Short Stories
    • Coffee Dating
    • St Tony’s Prayer
    • Waiting
  • SPI
  • Spirituality
  • Talks
    • Nods to the Old Gods

Alyson Dunlop's Blog

~ "Hex in the City"

Alyson Dunlop's Blog

Tag Archives: Dracula

Star-Crossed Vampire Lovers: Dracula as a Damned Eros

14 Friday Jun 2013

Posted by Alyson Dunlop Shanes in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Anthony Hopkins, Aphrodite, Atropos, Baal, Beelzebub, Blood, Bram Stoker, Carfax Abbey, classics, Clotho, Cupid, Demeter, Dr Seward, Dracula, Eros, Francis Ford Coppola, Gary Oldman, Greece, Horror, Jonathan Harker, Keanu Reeves, Lachesis, Lucy, Mina Harker, Mina Murray, Renfield, Richard E Grant, Sadie Frost, Sex, symbolism, The Fates, The Wyrd Sisters, Tom Waits, Transylvania, Van Helsing, Venus, Vlad Tepes, Vlad the Impaler, Winona Ryder, wolf

This contains spoilers!  Watch the movie first!

Click to view.

Click to view.

The 1992 film Bram Stoker’s Dracula, directed by Francis Ford Coppola, is a completely different take on the story of the monstrous Transylvanian count.  It is more than just a love story, and as I began to study classics almost ten years later I realised there was a deeper meaning to the tale.  The vampire had actually been portrayed as a fallen Eros, damned by God and His “mad men”.

hqdefaultThe movie starts as no other film about Dracula starts, with the Count in human form.  Here he is the real historical character we know Dracula to be based on, Vlad Tepes, Prince of Wallachia.  He goes into battle, leaving his beloved wife Elisabeta.  Whilst in battle, Elisabeta receives false word that her husband has been killed.  Devastated, she commits suicide.  On his return, Dracula is told by the priest (played by Anthony Hopkins who will later be his adversary, Van Helsing) that his wife is damned because she took her own life.  Dracula, enraged that the God he is fighting for should turn against him by condemning the woman he loves, renounces Him.  He then damns himself by drinking the blood from the cross he has stabbed with his sword.  Straight away, we know that the reason Dracula has willingly condemned himself to be damned is for the love of a woman, also damned.

   Four centuries later, in 1897, we find ourselves in London at the Carfax Lunatic Asylum and are introduced to Renfield, one of the patients.  He is talking to his “Master”, saying he has made preparations for his arrival, before eating a fly and thanking his invisible Master for his generosity.  In Nods to the Old Gods, I mention Beelzebub, a Semitic deity.  His name in Arabic was thought to mean Lord of the Flies, although this is probably a derogatory corruption of his true name Lord of the High Place (Heaven) or “High Lord”.  He is also called Ba’al, meaning “Lord” or “Master”.  He is primarily a sun god, and god of fertility.  If damned, as He was – like many other pagan gods were – surely Ba’al would be condemned never to walk in sunlight and all acts of fertility, such as sex and sexual love, would also be condemned as impure lust by opposing forces (i.e. early Christians).

  In the next scene, Renfield’s boss explains to Jonathon that Renfield has “lost his greedy mind”.  Beelzebub was condemned to be a Prince of Hell, his sin being that of gluttony, which ties in with Dracula’s insatiable appetite for feeding on human blood, and also perhaps with Renfield’s gluttony for flies.

  Dracula first appears as a supernatural being shortly after we are first introduced to our two protagonists, Mina and Jonathan, a couple very much in love who want to marry.  They are prevented from doing so until Jonathan has first visited Dracula.  Vampires and couples in love are often a motif of many Dracula stories.  The two things seem to be inextricably linked.  In Bram Stoker’s Dracula, the count finds a picture of Mina and immediately recognises her as the reincarnation of his beloved Elisabeta.

   Unlike any other Dracula story, Oldman catches us off-guard and talks of something no other Dracula has ever talked about.  He says: “The luckiest man who walks on this earth is the one who finds true love.”  He then induces our sympathy by beginning to cry whilst telling Jonathan that he was married once, but his wife died.

   As the story continues, other characters are introduced: the flirtatious, sexually knowledgeable and free-speaking Lucy is balanced with the virginal and sexually naïve Mina.  Lucy’s suitors, each one more in love with her than the other, are Quincy P Morris, Dr Jack Seward and Arthur Holmwood.  It is whilst watching Lucy flirting with all three men that Mina becomes aware of Dracula, an allegory of her sexual stirrings.

   Back at the asylum, Renfield accuses Dr Seward of being “love sick” (thought to be a real disease in ancient Greece!), whilst in Dracula’s castle, Jonathan is seduced by three female vampires.  They are described in Bram Stoker’s novel as Dracula’s three brides.  Collectively they are referred to as “sisters” and at one point “weird sisters”.  This is an interesting point.  The weird sisters appear also in Shakespeare’s Macbeth as witches, but originally these were the Wyrd Sisters, or Fates.  Here, The Fates therefore exist in order to determine Jonathan’s destiny.  Clotho, the spinner, who spins the thread of life; Lachesis, who chooses our lot in life, and how long that life will be; and Atropos, who cuts the thread of life with her shears.  In the film they are enjoying a sexual orgy with Jonathan, deciding his fate as they seduce him with their beauty and charm.

   Meanwhile, the Dracula-as-sexual-urges allegory appears again, as Dracula watches the girls playing and kissing in the maze during a storm.  Shortly afterwards Dracula lands in England and immediately entices a somnambulistic Lucy into the garden in order to seduce her.  Lucy is wearing a flowing red dress, the same colour as the old count’s coat at the castle.  The colour red seems to be a recurring motif of the film, perhaps symbolising its most usually associate emotion, passion and, of course, blood.  In this scene, where Mina finds Dracula in the form of a beast, feeding on Lucy whilst enjoying her almost sexually as well, Dracula causes Mina to forget seeing him in such a state.

 tumblr_m7fkooW9to1ryusq6o1_1280Soon after, fresh from feasting on the crew of the Demeter (incidentally, the ancient Greek mother goddess of the grain and fertility) and Lucy, Dracula appears as a young man walking through the streets of London.  He is now dashing enough to let Mina see him in princely form.  They go to the cinematograph, where Dracula seduces Mina.  Here, a wild wolf is used as a symbol of his wild passion, which he tames as he tames the wolf, in order that Mina is safe from his carnal desires.

    The next scene introduces us to Professor Abraham Van Helsing, as he gives a lecture on the problem of syphilis in Victorian society.  He points out that venereal diseases literally means the diseases of Venus, Roman goddess of love, which is a reference to their “divine origins”.  Venus is the mother of Cupid, the Roman god of love.  Eros is the Greek equivalent of Cupid, whilst Aphrodite is the Greek equivalent of Venus.

WINONA RYDER, GARY OLDMANAs Lucy lies gravely ill and dying, Mina is swept off her feet by her prince, and we see that the vampire does indeed have more than one side to him.  He gives Mina absinth to drink, which he describes as the “aphrodisiac of the soul”.  An important line, as I’ll point out soon.  Dracula, in this guise of Eros, and Mina, in the guise of Psyche (“the soul”), fall in love with each other all over again, whilst reminiscing about their sad parting.  However, when Jonathan, having escaped the castle, sends word that he is safe and wishes for Mina to join him to be married, Mina puts a stop to her clandestine trysts with Dracula.  She sails for Romania, still feeling he is with her, speaking to her in her thoughts.  She broods over the fact that, being single and enjoying the company of her sensual prince, she felt more alive than she ever had before.  Now, without him, about to marry Jonathan, she feels confused and lost.

   At this point, Van Helsing realises he is dealing with Dracula, one of the undead, and warns Morris to guard Lucy lest she become a “bitch of the Devil” and “a whore of darkness”.  He tells Morris that Lucy is not just a random victim, but a wanton follower.  She is “the Devil’s concubine”.  Lucy is the whore to Mina’s virgin.

   As Mina marries Jonathan, the enraged Dracula condemns her best friend Lucy to become a vampire, and an eternity of craving human blood.  He is the power or force of nature that no “foolish spells” can stop.  The men watch as Lucy, now an undead nocturnal creature who has evolved into a maternal killer of children (see my blog article Margaret Thatcher meets Medea for more on the image of the monstrous mother in film), carries a toddler into her lair presumably for devouring.  She is repelled by the cross, and defeated.

   The men know they must kill Dracula, and make their way to his resting place in Carfax Abbey, whilst Mina takes refuge in Dr Seward’s quarters in the asylum next door.  Whilst the men destroy and sterilise the boxes with his home soil in it, where the vampire must sleep, Dracula takes refuge with Mina.  He escapes unseen.  As a shape-shifter, Dracula can take on the form of several animals or mist.  He is clearly an ethereal being.

   Dracula visits Mina as she sleeps.  This scene conveys two things.  Initially it is the iconic incubus night demon who visits a sleeping woman in order to have sex with her (the succubus being the female equivalent who visits sleeping men).  This is thought by some to be a manifestation of the disturbed mind, and is linked to suppressed sexuality.  Dracula by Bram Stoker is itself linked to the suppression of women’s sexuality, especially in Victorian society when the story takes place.  This bedroom scene is also evocative of the Eros and Psyche story, which concerns the overcoming of obstacles to love that stand between the psyche (“soul” or “breath of life”) and Eros/Cupid (love and desire).  Initially Eros marries Psyche but, though a good and gentle lover, he does not allow her to see him.  He flees when she goes against this rule and looks upon his true nature.  The jealous goddess of love, Aphrodite, sets Psyche some tasks.  After she accomplishes the tasks, Psyche is thus purified through suffering and is now prepared to enjoy eternal happiness.  With the help of Zeus, she is reunited with her husband, Eros.

gary-oldman-top-11-draculaWhen, at last, Mina sees Dracula as he really is – a non-living being – she asks what he is.  His reply: “I am nothing.  Lifeless, soul-less, hated and feared.  I am dead to all the world…  I am the monster the breathing men would kill.  I am Dracula.”  Of these two lovers, Mina is the only one with a soul, and now she has seen her true love as he is.  She is devastated, realising he is the murderer of her friend Lucy, and therefore of flirtation and freedom.  Nevertheless, in spite of his true nature and in spite of herself, Mina finds she still loves this particular monster.  Her only desire is to become his partner in eternal life.  Even at this point, Dracula attempts to stop Mina from becoming “cursed for all eternity” because he loves her too much to condemn her.  The choice to be cursed is entirely Mina’s as she insists on drinking his blood: what would normally be perceived as an unholy communion, were it not for the fact that we understand these two to be true soul mates completely in love with one another.  The question should be, why is this love deemed evil by God (or His followers)?

   Christianity has always played a role in this story.  The men attempt to ward Dracula off by wielding crosses, one of the things that supposedly repel him.  He has been damned because he renounced the Christian God at the start of the story.  Nevertheless, he seems more empowered now, with the love of Mina, and manages to set fire to the cross Van Helsing is holding, saying “Look what your God has done to me.”  Again, following one of the most important scenes of this movie, this is one of the most important lines.  It is God, and His followers, that Dracula blames for turning him from a prince into a monster.  As any scholar of Christianity knows, as the new religion took over, everything of an erotic nature was condemned.  As Van Helsing himself says towards the end: “We’ve all become God’s mad men.”

draculaFinally, it is then up to Mina to give Dracula peace, piercing his heart and reuniting him once more with his soul in heaven.  Through her trials and suffering, Mina is at last blessed by God.  She is both the Virgin and the Magdalene, as well as Psyche.  Eros, in this 20th century story, has at last found His way into Paradise.  So too, possibly has The Magdalene, if that is who Mina is supposed to represent towards the end of the story.  Certainly Dracula takes on an almost Christ-like appearance as he ascends to Heaven and is reunited with God, and Mina must always be his counterpart.  This might seem a slightly complicated point, but it seems that Eros (erotic love) has been purified and is now innocent and pure enough to enter into Paradise.  Mina, in her vampiric state, is wanton and lustful.  At one point, she seduces and kisses Van Helsing.  In recent years, it has been widely agreed by religious scholars that Mary Magdalene was misidentified (possibly deliberately) as a prostitute.  However, there is no evidence of this.  Bram-Stoker-s-Dracula-bram-stokers-dracula-10793936-1024-576If Dracula as Eros has now become the epitomy of pure love (Christ), his lover Mina/Psyche/Magdalene has the mark of shame removed from her forehead and is also purified once more i.e. after many years of being falsely represented by the Church, we know now that The Magdalene was not a promiscuous “sinner” (not, I hasten to add, that I believe prostitution is a sin).  I *think* that might be the point of the ending…..

Until next week.  As always, your friend, A.D.

P.S. Remember you can sign up to have “Hex in the City” delivered direct to your email inbox via the link on the left of this page.

Sources:

http://www.greekmythology.com/Other_Gods/The_Fates/the_fates.html

Advertisement

My Guilty Pleasures of Horror: The Monsters I Love to Love

07 Friday Jun 2013

Posted by Alyson Dunlop Shanes in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Anthony Hopkins, Betty White, Bill Pullman, Brad Dourif, Bram Stoker, Brendan Gleeson, Bridget Fonda, cult films, Damien Karass, Dracula, Ellen Burstyn, Exorcist, Gary Oldman, George C Scott, giant worms, Halloween, Horror, Jason Miller, Kevin Bacon, Lake Placid, Linda Blair, Max Von Sydow, Merrin, Oliver Platt, Regan, religious horror, Renfield, science fiction, Tom Waits, Tremors, Van Helsing, William Friedkin, William Peter Blatty

placid2

I’ve seen these films so many times I could practically recite their scripts!  Yet, often they get slated by critics for one reason or another.  We all have our guilty pleasures, so I thought this week I would share mine with you.  Comment and tell me what your guilty pleasures are (in film that is!  Naughty!).

Lake Placid (1999)

Click to view

Click to view

What’s not to love about Lake Placid?  It’s hilarious and scary all in the same movie.  Critics often say that it doesn’t know what it’s trying to be, whether horror or comedy.  It has been claimed that the actors haven’t a clue how to say their lines or react because they don’t know if they should be humorous or scared.  Rubbish!  They know fine well that it’s supposed to be a comedy horror.  There are a couple of bits that’ll have you jumping out your seat, but overall it’s a highly entertaining and funny film. 

The movie is about a 30-foot man-eating crocodile in New England.  The opening credits are very Jaws-like, as is the opening scene.  In fact, there are several scenes that are reminiscent of the shark movie.  It’s definitely a nod to Spielberg.   It’s set in Maine, which is possibly a nod to Stephen King as well.

There are also an abundance of great one-liners from Oliver Platt, Brendan Gleeson (Argh!  I didn’t recognise him as Hamish from Braveheart until today!) and a foul-mouthed Betty White.

Lake Placid is definitely one of my top guilty pleasures.  I don’t care what anyone says!  It’s a cracker.

Tremors (1990)

Click to view.

Click to view.

I haven’t seen this on TV for a few years.  Mind you, I don’t have a TV!  Nevertheless, every time I saw this was on, I just had to tune in and watch.  It’s the kind of film that’s normally on around 1am, and you can just zone out and watch without thinking too much.  There’s a lot of humour in it and a chance to see a young Kevin Bacon dressed as a cowboy.  My favourite part is the pole-vaulting scene! 

This film is a science fiction horror comedy, which has a lot of humour and has emerged as a cult classic.  Despite not being successful at the box office, Tremors has continued to appeal to many and became a hit through TV, video and internet viewers.

Tremors is about giant underground worms.  If you’ve not seen it, that probably doesn’t sound hugely appealing, but trust me and check it out!

Exorcist (1973)

Click to view.

Click to view.

I remember a few years ago, when I was setting out to do a post graduate in film and television studies.  We were asked to write down what we considered to be the best film of all time.  This is such a difficult thing to do.  I pondered on the problem for hours.  It very much depends on your experience of movies, and whether or not you’ve been shown what is considered to be a “quality” movie, by supposed experts.  You also have to take into consideration that not everyone likes every genre.  There were so many great films I had yet to see: Metropolis, Citizen Kane etc.  Besides, there are all sorts of things to consider such as when a film is set and the impact it has on the audience of that time.  The Exorcist had a huge impact on its original audience in 1973.   I also have a fair bit of respect for both the writer, William Peter Blatty and the director, William Friedkin (the nutter!), having also watched the making of the film.  On a small budget, he used many original ideas for special FX and sound.

Still, I was left with one of my classmates responses ringing in my ears: “Brave choice….”.   Diplomatic code for “Are you mental by any chance?” There are, of course, better.   I agree.  By today’s standard The Exorcist is by no means top of the range, but I still think it’s one of the best and original films made.  I never tire of watching it.  Years later it still provides timeless entertainment of human fears of the unknown, and epitomises the good vs evil/religious horror sub- genre.

Exorcist III (1990)

Click to view.

Click to view.

Conveniently missing out the Exorcist II (don’t!), I also loved Exorcist III – some pretty spooky stuff going on.  I’ve already mentioned it in a previous blog, so won’t elaborate too much.  Despite, George C Scott getting nominated for a Golden Raspberry Award for worst actor – for shame! – Exorcist III still managed to achieve quite a lot of success.  William Peter Blatty won a Saturn Award from the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror Films (USA) for Best Writing.  It also received nominations for Best Supporting Actor (Brad Dourif, as always, was incredible – if my current book ever gets made into a movie I have a part just crying out for him to play!) and Best Horror Film.  Such a shame the disappointing first sequel deterred people from going to see it.  It’s definitely one to watch, if you’re a fan of the original.

Halloween (1978)

laurie-strode_786x11742

Click to view.

Halloween, like all good slashers, is set at a celebratory time of year.  In this case, Hallowe’en – originally Samhain, the pagan feast of the (not particularly evil) dead.  In Christian times the festival became known as Hallowe’en and children would dress up to scare away evil spirits.  In any case, it’s associated with death.

Then we have an almost supernatural-like serial killer, with superhuman strength, who seems to appear and disappear in an instant, killing anyone who has too much sex, smokes or drinks booze.

This is definitely one of my favourite guilty pleasures!

Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992)

Click to view.

Click to view.

I’m going to be dedicating a blog to this film as it’s actually a HUGE guilty pleasure of mine! 

Bram Stoker’s Dracula stands out for me primarily due to the acting of Gary Oldman, Tom Waits and Anthony Hopkins.  The three are all great in their own eccentric way:  Oldman, as Count Dracula, Tom Waits as Renfield and Hopkins as Van Helsing.  I also love the dark, dream-like quality that runs throughout the film.  It’s another movie I never tire of watching.  Francis Ford Coppola used various subtexts and folkloric symbolism, which won me over instantly.   I see something different in it every time I watch.

Until next week, feel free to love what you love.

Remember to leave a comment below and tell me your favourite guilty pleasure!

Your friend, A.D.

MARGARET THATCHER MEETS MEDEA: Witches and Monstrous Mothers throughout the Ages.

12 Friday Apr 2013

Posted by Alyson Dunlop Shanes in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Blood, Carrie, Christianity, Colchis, curses, demonisation, Dracula, Euripides, feminism, Greek, Hekate, Horror, Jason, Lucy, Magi, magic, Malleus Maleficarum, Margaret Thatcher, Medea, menstruation, monsters, monstrous mothers, periods, powerful women, prophesy, Psycho, Religion, sacrifice, Sex, sexism, sexual predators, Stephen King, supernatural, The Devil, Vampire, vampirism, witch, witchcraft, women

lucyMargaret Thatcher is nothing, if not memorable.  She is both loved and reviled, depending on which side of the fence you stand on.  It is not my intention to pay a tribute, though it does seem like a fitting topic this week, following the death of Thatcher, to discuss legendary women who fall into the category of ‘monstrous mothers’.  Their deeds are outwith the accepted boundaries of what it means to be a woman.  They, therefore, become known as a witch or monster.

Medea, wife of Jason, in the classical tale of the same name, is one such witch.  Written in 431 BCE by the Greek playwright Euripides, Medea tells the story of a foreign witch betrayed by the man she loves.  She gives up everything, her wealth and status, for Jason; everything, that is, except her magic.  In fact, Medea is a priestess of Hekate from Colchis.  This was the special domain of sorcery known as Kolkha.  In the 6th century BCE Colchis came under the Persian Empire†.  In Greece, foreign religions were treated suspiciously and given the name ‘magic’; terms which arose from the name of the Persian priests, The Magi.  Medea is treated badly throughout the story, both by the suspicious women of her new town and from her once beloved Jason.  The townswomen do not like that Medea dresses differently from them; and Jason betrays her when he decides to marry Princess Glauce.  Glauce is deemed to be more of an appealing match.  After all, Medea is only a ‘barbarian woman’ in the eyes of the Greeks.  By this point in the story, Medea has raised Jason’s two sons, and gets her own appalling revenge on him by murdering his wife and her father on the wedding day.  She goes on to murder the two sons that she and Jason have together.  Medea is shown, however, to be an oppressed victim, appealing for the sympathy of the audience. In this tale, she escapes in a blaze of glory, astride dragons, having wreaked her revenge on the philandering Jason.  

The Sun himself, the source of all life and warmth, vindicating the cause of passion, disorder, violent cruelty, against the cold, orderly, self-protective process of civilised man, is a reminder that the universe is not on the side of civilisation; and that a life combining order with happiness is something men must win for themselves in continual struggle with an unsympathetic environment. (1)

This week, I’ve read the line: “Ding dong the witch is dead…” so often I can’t now seem to get it out my head.  Interestingly, it was not until The Wizard of Oz, that we had the introduction of the witch as a terrifying character on the silver screen. 

The witch has always inspired dread and fear, going back to ancient times, as can be seen in the case of Medea.  The earliest known witches were feared only because they were thought to have magical and terrifying powers, not because of any association with The Devil.  This was a later-added Christian fear (both The Devil and the association of The Devil with witches).

In some cultures, young girls who experienced prophetic dreams during menstruation were thought to be witches.  There was often this association with blood and the supernatural.  Menstruation was linked to the ‘witches curse’, something Stephen King explored in his much celebrated story Carrie.  Historically, the curse of a woman who was menstruating or pregnant was believed to be much more powerful.  It was known as a ‘Mother’s Curse’, and meant certain death.  In the 14th century, the secret feminine knowledge of midwifery became associated with witchcraft and in 1484 The Malleus Maleficarum stated that witches were castrators.  Clearly men, therefore, had much to fear from these devil women!  Witches, during those years, were often accused of such things.  The main reason given for a woman’s ‘otherness’ is her natural carnal nature.  Here is a shining example of the demonisation of women and sex, rolled into one convenient package.  Burn the horny cock-thieving bitches!

In horror, the witch still has an essentially sexual nature, with supernatural powers and a wish to harm, wreaking destruction on the community.  Being closer to nature than man, she can control such things as storms and hurricanes.  In Carrie, the anti-heroine is a young menstruating woman, although not a mother.  The monstrous mother role is given to her mother, who desires to control her daughter through a warped sense of religious morals.  At no point in the story does she ever really show a maternal bond with Carrie.  In both Psycho and Carrie the monstrous child is a product of the psychotic, domineering and monstrous mother.  There is, incidentally, another important similarity between Carrie and Psycho.  Both Marion in Psycho and Carrie, are punished severely after enjoying sensual pleasures in the shower, and both these scenes end in blood-shed. 

Having been given no prior warning about periods from her mother, Carrie is then subjected to a lecture on the sins of women when she returns home.  Raving about sexist religious beliefs, Mrs White goes on to blame all human evil on women.  Woman is the universal scapegoat, and Carrie is, therefore, the sacrificial victim at the Prom, where she is baptised in the blood of a pig as a joke by her bullying classmates.  Carrie is ‘crowned queen and anointed with pig’s blood’ before going on to wage her terrible and monstrous revenge.  Like Medea, we are encouraged to view her display of monstrosity with sympathy because, like Medea, Carrie has been treated appallingly by her female peers and (not her husband) her mother.

Both women desire a fresh start at the end of their vengeful outburst: Medea in Athens, and Carrie, pictured as a trembling child washing off the indicators of her womanhood, kills her mother and returns to the ‘womb’ of the dark closet.

It’s pretty safe to conclude that the monstrous female is a patriarchal invention.  Women tend not to be frightened of themselves, usually.  In horror, the monstrous nature of women is undoubtedly linked with her place as man’s sexual other (2).

The dark side of maternity is also explored in Bram Stoker’s Dracula.  The Count, described by Almond as a ‘monstrous baby’, suckles on women, turning them into bad mothers: ‘non-maternal sexual predators’ such as the vampirised Lucy, is later destroyed by honourable men.  Furthermore, the three female vampires encountered by Jonathon Harker are representative of rampant female sexuality, much reviled by Victorian society.  In such a society, they symbolise the corruption of motherhood.  With witch-like qualities Shakespeare would have been proud to see, the terrifying power these three possess is female sexuality.  Furthermore, Lucy goes from unconscious flirtatiousness to becoming blatantly seductive and, therefore, dangerous.  Shortly after her death there are newspaper reports of children going missing who later, returning with bitten necks, report having met a beautiful woman who turns out to be Lucy.  When confronted vampirising a child at night, Lucy callously discards the child and attempts to seduce her husband, Arthur.  This is a scene which shows female sexuality is incompatible with maternity, a strong Victorian notion.  It also reverses the roles of the mother and child.  Instead of the child feeding from the mother-figure, the mother feeds upon the child (3).

Powerful and/or sexual women are often seen as a threat to a patriarchal-dominated society, whether or not they and their behaviour deserves to be viewed as ‘monstrous’.  Like her or loathe her, Margaret Thatcher was a successful politician from the late 1950s, gaining the ultimately most powerful position possible in 1979 when she became Prime Minister of the UK.  Thereafter, she became a Monstrous Mother, suppressing the power of her ‘children’, sending them to be killed in unnecessary wars, increasing their poverty and manipulating them with well-timed elections.  Eventually, 200,000 of Maggie’s children demonstrated against her policies.  There’s definitely a gothic horror story in that!  I doubt, however, that Maggie would get as much sympathy as Medea or Carrie… 

I’m not sure either if she had an ‘essentially sexual nature’, though no doubt she was the wank fantasy of some BDSM pervs…

Well, anyway, I’m even more grateful to have such a loving mother when you see what’s out there!  Mine even gave me a kidney – she’s a keeper!

Until next week: More power to MILFs!  Your friend, A.D.

 

(1)               Euripides, Medea & Other Plays Penguin (1963 edition) p9.

(2)               Creed, B   (1993) Woman as Witch in “The Monstrous Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis” Routledge pp73-83.

(3)               Almond, B R (2006) Monstrous Infants and Vampyric Mothers in Bram Stoker’s Dracula in “The International Journal of Psychoanalysis” 2007:88:219-35.

† The Making of the Georgian Nation: 2nd Ed, Ronald Grigor Suny, p 13

Fear, Madness and Repressed Sexuality in Dark Fantasy and Horror

22 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by Alyson Dunlop Shanes in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Blood, Dark Fantasy, Demons, Desire, Dracula, Fear, Hallucination, Horror, Madness, Psychological, Repressed, Sensuality, Sex, Sexuality, Sleep Paralyis, Vampire

vampire4“In a world which is indeed our world, the one we know, a world without devils, sylphides, or vampires, there occurs an event which cannot be explained by the laws of this same familiar world.  The person who experiences the event must opt for one of two possible solutions: either he is a victim of an illusion of the senses, of a product of the imagination – and the laws of the world remain what they are; or else the event has indeed taken place, it is an integral part of reality – but then this reality is controlled by laws unknown to us…   The fantastic occupies the duration of this uncertainty.  Once we choose one answer or the other, we leave the fantastic for a neighbouring genre, the uncanny or the marvellous.  The fantastic is that hesitation experienced by a person who knows only the laws of nature, confronting an apparently supernatural event.” (Tzvetan Todorov:  The Fantastic, A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, Press of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 1975 p25).

In order for horror and dark fantasy to be remotely compelling to the reader, it should be somewhat believable and a tad inexplicable, enough to make us feel ‘creeped out’ or on the edge of our seats, at any rate.  Those who read these genres, particularly vampire stories, are often deeply aware of the significance of the literature, if indeed they have not had an experience of sleep paralysis accompanied by hallucination; if hallucination is what demons are, springing from the mind of the victim.  The experience of them is every bit as real as you sitting here reading this blog.  Throughout literary history there have always been souls who understood what vampires and demons symbolised, as well as how to defeat them.

Our most disturbing fears, if awakened, will teach us something of our present circumstances.  These fantastical events never occur without reason.  Like attracts like – negative environments and people very often bring their negative influences to our own psyche.  Our beliefs, fears and unconscious mind do the rest.  By allowing ourselves to remain in that state of mind we open ourselves up to terrifying experiences (or dark energy is attracted to us, whichever you choose to believe).  Either way, writers of dark fantasy and horror are often your guiding light in Hell.

These writers usually have a deep understanding of the Otherworld and reader’s darkest fears.  They take you there in order that you may better understand the many possible dangers and demons that can be encountered in life; and they hopefully end the story with a solution of how to defeat these monsters.

One of the most famous horror writers is Bram Stoker, author of Dracula.  We’ll come to the Count in a minute, but it is interesting that the subject of the disturbed mind is present in the form of Renfield, who has some very important information for the reader.  Note too the eccentric figure of Van Helsing, a slightly mad, but genius doctor, who also has the required knowledge of the fantastic as well as the mundane.  In fact, many of Stoker’s characters question their sanity throughout the story.

Blood, as the mad Renfield informs us, is the life.  By consuming blood, he says, you gain the vital powers of the person whose blood you are draining.  This is proved by his Master – Count Dracula – who becomes younger after drinking the blood of the youthful Lucy.  She becomes weaker, eventually dying, as he becomes stronger.  Mina drinks his blood in some kind of perverse and unholy communion.   Dracula is very clearly placed in opposition to God, and we can assume that he therefore represents the Devil himself.   In fact, Dracula is indeed compared to the Devil several times.  As for Renfield, he is the unfortunate mad man who speaks the truth: the ‘Cassandra’ of this story.

Of course, blood is symbolic of so many things.  On the subject of transubstantiation, in some pagan faiths, such as Sioux, there is a long-held belief that eating the flesh of a certain animal empowers you with that animal’s vital essence and spirit, a superstition that undoubtedly found its way around the world in many other guises.  Bram Stoker was probably aware of the legend of Countess Bathory who, regardless of whether she did or not, supposedly bathed in the blood of virgins to retain her youth (See Footnote 1).  In our modern world, we are well aware that blood transfusion saves lives.  This was only a recent discovery in Stoker’s time, but he does mention, and describe, the procedure in Dracula.   Most importantly, blood symbolises the potent life and energy we possess.  Without it, we die. That life and energy is required so that the figurative vampire may live.  In other words, if we let our fears take us over, or repress our innermost desires, we will be drained, disempowered, possibly depressed and eventually die.

Sleeping and night time are, of course, the places you will encounter vampires and other night demons, and in Dracula it is no different.  Disturbed sleep is touched upon with the somnambulistic Lucy, who is easier to control when she is in this state.  Sleeping people cannot defend themselves, like the state of sleep paralysis mentioned earlier.  It is in this state that people are also very often prone to hallucinations.  This is a condition which has been described for centuries by those who have reported incubus and succubus attacks.  These creatures are night demons who feed upon our energy or have sex with us, in much the same way as Dracula does with Lucy and Mina.  Dracula, therefore, is bound up not only with our fears but also with our repressed sexuality.  The vampire’s teeth penetrating the neck of his or her victim, is symbolic of sexual penetration and shows our deep-rooted primal desire to be fucked.  Hard.  By a sexy, charismatic guy with a castle and pet wolves.  Possibly.  You get the picture.   In the half-asleep world of sleep paralysis we are bound, helpless to our inner desires and fears.  It is then that the vampire is free to strike, and the hallucination takes over.

Never fear, there is hope, and Stoker et al give us some clues on how to defeat the darkness in our lives.  I suppose it’s up to each of us to take what we will out of that, but you’ll have to take a deep breath, pick up the books and face your fears for yourself….

In Sisterhood of the Wolf there is an appearance of a mysterious stranger.  To begin with, he is not identified as a vampire, but there are many tell-tale signs.  He is dark, with penetrating eyes, and there is an enticing quality about him.  Channing knows she should not be anywhere near him, but she simply cannot help herself.  There’s also something strange about Channing which, again, the reader will no doubt suspect long before it happens.  She should be able to smell the stranger from across the street.  That’s some super-power!  Nevertheless, even although she cannot, she still gets a warning, a tingling, before she sees him.  He has a magical super-power too!  He is able to influence her senses and actions.   Channing needs no persuasion to follow his command, even though the impression is of a strong independent woman.

This short opening scene is intended to be sensual, sexual, tense and dangerous.  I have deliberately cut off the reader at this point, hoping it will leave you all wanting more!  What I can say, for now, is that Channing is not scared for her own wellbeing.  She’s a woman well able to take care of herself, and that dark stranger better watch out.  He is about to bite off much more than he can chew!   This is definitely a book for feminists!

Until next week, your friend… A D.

Footnote

1. He was certainly aware of some of the history of eastern Europe, as is evident with his lead character, based on real life Vlad III, Prince of Wallachia, also known by his patronymic name of Dracula.  A name he inherited via his father Vlad II Dracul, a member of the Order of the Dragon.  The real Dracula’s cruelty was renowned, and his preferred method of execution was impalement, where Stoker no doubt derived the classical image of the stake – one of the methods used to kill vampires.

Follow me!

YouTube FBBtwittertumblr-logo_zps5dc10b69

Alyson Dunlop

Twitter Updates

  • RT @theurigeller: Ah #MysticMeg has passed. So identifiable by name and image, the quintessential fortune teller who brought mystery and my… 3 weeks ago
  • This is sickening. @RishiSunak & @Jeremy_Hunt are working up plans to tell GPs not to sign people off sick from wor… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 month ago
  • RT @NicolaSturgeon: Thanks to Frank for his door service over the years…and to the wonderful @JaneyGodley for always making me laugh, even… 1 month ago
  • RT @tozdee57: Why didn't #ReportingScotland show the arsehole #GlennCampbell's final question to #NicolaSturgeon at her press conference? A… 1 month ago
  • Happy 214th Birthday, Edgar! twitter.com/englishwhirled… 2 months ago

Creative Writing Exercise Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • The Danger of Conspiracy Theories
  • Question Time for Gary Heseltine
  • Ali Jay Stone
  • Peter Robbins Versus The Haters
  • ADX 93 Miguel Conner

Archives

  • April 2020
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • May 2018
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • November 2012
  • August 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012

Categories

  • Creative Writing Exercise
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 920 other subscribers

Blog Stats

  • 100,547 hits

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Alyson Dunlop's Blog
    • Join 78 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Alyson Dunlop's Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.